Subordinate clauses: the verb goes to the end
After omdat, dat, als and other subordinating words, the finite verb jumps to the end of its clause: ... omdat ik moe ben.
A bijzin (subordinate clause) is a part of a sentence that cannot stand on its own; it hangs off a main clause and usually starts with a linking word like omdat (because) or dat (that): Ik blijf thuis omdat ik moe ben. (I'm staying home because I'm tired.) The key thing to learn is what happens to the verb inside that clause.
How the word order works
In a subordinate clause the finite verb β the conjugated verb that agrees with the subject β moves to the very end of the clause, right next to any other verbs. Compare a main clause, where the finite verb sits in second position:
| Main clause (verb second) | Subordinate clause (verb last) |
|---|---|
| Ik ben moe. (I am tired.) | ..., omdat ik moe ben. |
| Het regent. (It is raining.) | ..., als het regent. |
| Zij woont in Utrecht. (She lives in Utrecht.) | ..., dat zij in Utrecht woont. |
So the same sentence changes shape once you put a linking word in front of it:
- Start the clause with the subordinating word: omdat, dat, als, terwijl (while), hoewel (although), and others. See subordinating conjunctions for the full list.
- Keep the subject and the middle of the sentence in their normal order: ... omdat ik vandaag geen tijd ...
- Send the finite verb to the end: ... omdat ik vandaag geen tijd heb. (... because I have no time today.)
When the clause has more than one verb, they all gather at the end. The participle or infinitive stays put and the finite verb joins it: Ik denk dat hij naar huis is gegaan. (I think he has gone home.) Either order of the two verbs is usually fine (... is gegaan or ... gegaan is); more on stacking verbs in the end verb cluster.
When the verb goes to the end
The rule kicks in whenever the clause opens with a subordinating word. The most common triggers:
- Reason or cause: omdat, doordat, aangezien (since). Ze belde niet omdat haar telefoon leeg was. (She didn't call because her phone was dead.)
- Condition or time: als (if/when), toen (when, in the past), terwijl, voordat (before), nadat (after), zodra (as soon as). Bel me als je op het station staat. (Call me when you're at the station.)
- A dat-clause reporting or naming something: Ik hoop dat het morgen droog blijft. (I hope it stays dry tomorrow.)
- Contrast or purpose: hoewel (although), zodat (so that). We namen de fiets, hoewel het hard waaide. (We took the bike, although it was blowing hard.)
The little words that join two full main clauses β en (and), maar (but), of (or), want (because), dus (so) β do not do this. After them the verb stays in second position: Ik blijf thuis, want ik ben moe. Notice want keeps normal order, but its close cousin omdat sends the verb to the end. For the difference between want and omdat, see want, omdat or doordat.
When the subclause comes first
You can put the subordinate clause at the front of the sentence. When you do, the whole clause fills the first position, so the main clause that follows must start with its verb (the verb-second rule counting the clause as one unit):
- Omdat ik moe ben, blijf ik thuis. (Because I'm tired, I'm staying home.)
- Toen de film begon, ging het licht uit. (When the film started, the light went out.)
The verb is still last inside the subclause (ben, begon), and the main clause verb comes right after the comma (blijf, ging).
Mistakes to avoid
English keeps the same word order in this kind of clause ("because I am tired"), so English speakers often leave the Dutch verb in second position: omdat ik ben moe. That is wrong β the verb must go to the end: omdat ik moe ben. Whenever you write a clause starting with omdat, dat, als, terwijl and the like, check that the conjugated verb has landed at the very end.
- Vul in: *Ik ga niet mee, omdat ik geen tijd ___.*
- heb ik
- heb
- ik heb
- hebt
*Omdat* is a subordinating word, so the finite verb goes to the end: *... omdat ik geen tijd **heb***. The subject *ik* stays after *omdat*.
- Which sentence has the correct word order?
- Ik denk dat hij is ziek.
- Ik denk dat hij ziek is.
- Ik denk dat is hij ziek.
- Ik denk hij dat ziek is.
After *dat* the verb moves to the end: *... dat hij ziek **is***. In a main clause it would be *hij is ziek*, but the *dat*-clause flips it.
- Why does *want* keep the verb in second position but *omdat* does not?
- *want* joins two main clauses; *omdat* starts a subordinate clause
- *want* is only used in writing
- there is no difference
- *omdat* is always wrong
*Want* is a coordinating word linking two main clauses, so normal order stays (*..., want ik ben moe*). *Omdat* opens a subordinate clause and sends the verb to the end (*..., omdat ik moe ben*).
- Vul in: *___ , ging het licht uit.* (Choose the correctly built subclause + main clause.)
- Toen de film begon
- Toen begon de film
- Toen de film begonnen
- De film toen begon
Inside the fronted subclause the verb is last: *Toen de film **begon***. Then the main clause starts with its verb: *..., **ging** het licht uit.*
- Spot the error: *Ze blijft binnen, terwijl het regent buiten.*
- *terwijl* should be *omdat*
- *regent* should be at the very end: *terwijl het buiten regent*
- *blijft* is wrong
- nothing is wrong
In the *terwijl*-clause the finite verb must come last, after *buiten*: *terwijl het buiten **regent***. Placing *regent* before *buiten* leaves it in the middle, which breaks the rule.
Test yourself
Question 1 of 5
Vul in: Ik ga niet mee, omdat ik geen tijd ___.