hen, hun, or ze? The Dutch object pronoun for 'them'
Use hen for a direct object or after a preposition, hun for an indirect object without one, and unstressed ze in any of these object roles.
Ik zie ze. (I see them.) Here ze is an unstressed object form for people. The full object forms are hen and hun. Possessive hun comes before a noun, as in hun huis (their house). The subject form for they is zij or ze in Standard Dutch. This page separates these uses and explains the traditional object rule.
Use the traditional full-form rule for hen and hun
The traditional full-form rule uses hen for a direct object or after a preposition and hun for an indirect object without a preposition. Unstressed ze can replace either form in these object roles.
In Ik zie hen (I see them), hen is the direct object: it names the people seen.
In Ik geef hun het boek (I give them the book), hun is the indirect object: it names the people who receive the book.
A preposition is a linking word such as aan (to), voor (for), met (with), or op (on). The traditional full form after any preposition is hen.
| Situation | Traditional full form | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Direct object | hen | We bedankten hen. (We thanked them.) |
| After a preposition | hen | Ik wacht op hen. (I am waiting for them.) |
| Indirect object, no preposition | hun | Ik geef hun het boek. (I give them the book.) |
The same recipient can appear with or without aan. Without a preposition, write Ik geef hun het boek. (I give them the book.) With aan, write Ik geef het boek aan hen. (I give the book to them.)
Use unstressed ze for people in every object role
Ik geef ze het boek. (I give them the book.) The reduced form ze is the short, unstressed form of both hen and hun. When it refers to people, ze is standard as a direct object, an indirect object, or an object after a preposition. You can therefore also say Ik zie ze. (I see them.) and Ik wacht op ze. (I am waiting for them.)
Ik bedoel hén, niet jullie. (I mean them, not you.) This sentence contrasts them with you, so the pronoun is stressed and needs a full form. Ze cannot carry this stress. Formal writing also uses full hen or hun more often, even when the pronoun is unstressed.
Full hen and hun refer only to people. Unstressed ze can also refer to things as a direct object: Ik lees de rapporten. Ik lees ze. (I read the reports. I read them.) After a preposition, things normally use er + preposition: Ik wacht op de rapporten becomes Ik wacht erop. (I am waiting for them.) A preposition followed by ze also occurs informally for things, but the er form is usual.
Use possessive hun before a noun
Dat is hun huis. (That is their house.) Here hun comes before the noun huis (house) and shows possession. Keep this possessive hun before the noun; hen and ze do not show possession.
Compare the traditional rule with actual usage
Seventeenth-century grammarians created the distinction between object hen and hun. It is an artificial writing rule rather than a stable distinction from spontaneous speech. Speakers have mixed the forms for centuries. Careful writing often mixes them too.
Use the table when you want the strict traditional norm. Many speakers and editors also use hen where that rule expects indirect-object hun. The Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst (General Dutch Grammar) accepts this use of hen, while many publishers still keep the school rule. For a fast decision without the history, see hen or hun?.
Use zij or ze as the subject
Ze wonen in Amsterdam. (They live in Amsterdam.) Standard Dutch uses stressed zij or unstressed ze as the subject. You may hear subject hun in the Netherlands, as in Hun wonen in Amsterdam, but current authorities classify it as nonstandard. Possessive hun and object hun remain standard in the roles above.
- Fill in the blank: *Ik heb ___ gisteren op straat gezien.* (Use the traditional full form for them as a direct object.)
- *hun*
- *hen*
- *haar*
- *zij*
The people are the direct object of *zien* (to see), so the traditional full form is *hen*: *Ik heb hen gisteren op straat gezien.* Unstressed *ze* is also standard, but this question asks for the full form.
- Which sentence follows the traditional rule for an indirect object without a preposition?
- *Ik geef hen een cadeau.*
- *Ik geef hun een cadeau.*
- *Ik geef zij een cadeau.*
- *Ik geef hen aan een cadeau.*
The people receive the gift, so they are the indirect object. There is no preposition before the pronoun, so the traditional rule uses *hun*: *Ik geef hun een cadeau.*
- Fill in the blank: *Deze bloemen zijn voor ___.* (Use the traditional full form for them.)
- *hun*
- *hen*
- *zij*
- *haar*
*Voor* (for) is a preposition, so the traditional full form is *hen*: *Deze bloemen zijn voor hen.* Unstressed *ze* is also possible in less formal language.
- Which pronoun is the usual unstressed choice for them in everyday Dutch?
- *hen*
- *hun*
- *ze*
- *zij*
*Ze* is the reduced, unstressed form for a direct object, an indirect object, and an object after a preposition: *Ik zie ze*, *Ik geef ze het boek*, *Ik wacht op ze*. Use a full form when the pronoun carries contrastive stress.
- Spot the error: *Hun wonen in Amsterdam.*
- *Hun* should be *Zij* (a subject needs a subject pronoun)
- *wonen* should be *woont*
- *in* should be *op*
- nothing is wrong
Subject *hun* occurs in Dutch speech, especially in the Netherlands, but it is not Standard Dutch. Use stressed *zij* or unstressed *ze*: *Zij wonen in Amsterdam.*
Test yourself
Question 1 of 5
Fill in the blank: Ik heb ___ gisteren op straat gezien. (Use the traditional full form for them as a direct object.)