The Dutch pluperfect (had gedaan): the past before the past
How to build the Dutch pluperfect with had or was plus a past participle, and how it orders one past event before another.
The pluperfect (in Dutch, the voltooid verleden tijd) is the past before the past: it marks an event that had already happened before another moment in the past. Toen ik aankwam, was de trein al vertrokken. (When I arrived, the train had already left.)
How to form it
Take hebben or zijn in the simple past β had / hadden or was / waren β and add the past participle at the end of the clause: Ik had gewerkt. (I had worked.)
- Choose the same helper the verb uses in the present perfect: hebben for most verbs, zijn for verbs of movement or change. See hebben or zijn?.
- Put that helper in the simple past: hebben β had (singular) / hadden (plural); zijn β was (singular) / waren (plural).
- Add the past participle at the end: Zij waren al gegaan. (They had already gone.)
The pluperfect is the present perfect with the helper moved one step further back in time. Compare:
| Present perfect | Pluperfect |
|---|---|
| Ik heb gewerkt (I have worked) | Ik had gewerkt (I had worked) |
| Hij heeft gebeld (He has called) | Hij had gebeld (He had called) |
| Wij hebben gegeten (We have eaten) | Wij hadden gegeten (We had eaten) |
| Ik ben gegaan (I have gone) | Ik was gegaan (I had gone) |
| Zij is gevallen (She has fallen) | Zij was gevallen (She had fallen) |
When do you use it
- To show one past event happened before another: Ze had het boek al gelezen voordat de film uitkwam. (She had already read the book before the film came out.)
- Often together with toen (when), nadat (after) or al (already): Nadat we hadden gegeten, gingen we naar huis. (After we had eaten, we went home.)
- In an als clause about an unreal past, next to the conditional: Als ik dat had geweten, was ik thuisgebleven. (If I had known that, I would have stayed home.)
Mistakes to avoid
The helper follows the same hebben or zijn split as the present perfect, so it is had for most verbs but was / waren for movement and change verbs: Ik was gevallen (I had fallen), not ik had gevallen; Ik had gegeten (I had eaten), not ik was gegeten. Do not replace the pluperfect with the present perfect when you are ordering two past events β the earlier one needs had or was, not heb or ben.
- Vul in: *Toen we aankwamen, ___ de gasten al ___.* (vertrekken β vertrokken)
- hadden ... vertrokken
- waren ... vertrokken
- waren ... vertrekken
- hebben ... vertrokken
*Vertrekken* is a movement verb and takes *zijn*, so in the pluperfect it uses *waren* (plural past of *zijn*): *waren ... vertrokken.*
- What is the pluperfect of *Ik heb gewerkt*?
- Ik was gewerkt
- Ik heb gewerkt gehad
- Ik had gewerkt
- Ik werkte
*Werken* takes *hebben*, so the pluperfect uses the simple past *had* plus the participle: *Ik had gewerkt.*
- Which sentence correctly orders the two past events?
- Ik ging naar bed nadat ik het licht heb uitgedaan.
- Ik ging naar bed nadat ik het licht had uitgedaan.
- Ik ging naar bed nadat ik het licht uitdeed.
- Ik ben naar bed gegaan nadat ik het licht uitdoe.
Turning off the light happened first, so it takes the pluperfect *had uitgedaan*; going to bed is the later past event.
- Vul in: *Zij ___ al naar huis ___ voordat het begon te regenen.* (gaan β gegaan)
- had ... gegaan
- was ... gegaan
- heeft ... gegaan
- was ... gaan
*Gaan* takes *zijn*, so the pluperfect uses *was* (singular past of *zijn*) plus *gegaan*: *Zij was al naar huis gegaan.*
- Why use *had gelezen* here: *Ze kende het einde al, want ze had het boek gelezen.*?
- because reading the book happened before she knew the ending
- because *lezen* takes *zijn*
- because the sentence is a question
- because *had* is always used after *want*
The pluperfect *had gelezen* marks the earlier event (reading the book) that came before the past moment of knowing the ending.
Test yourself
Question 1 of 5
Vul in: Toen we aankwamen, ___ de gasten al ___. (vertrekken β vertrokken)