erop, ermee, eraan: preposition + it/them
For a thing, Dutch can replace preposition + it/them with er plus the same preposition, either joined or split across the clause.
When a preposition refers back to a thing, Dutch normally puts er before that preposition: Ik wacht op de trein. β Ik wacht erop. (I am waiting for it.) The same two parts can be separated: Ik heb er lang op gewacht. (I waited for it for a long time.) Here er points back to a known object, non-human animal, idea, or situation. This construction is often called a pronominal adverb.
Keep the preposition the construction selects
The verb, adjective, or expression chooses the preposition; er does not. Start with the complete fixed verb + preposition, and keep that preposition when you replace an object that refers to a thing.
- Find the selected preposition: wachten op (to wait for), denken aan (to think about), praten over (to talk about).
- Replace that thing with er while keeping the preposition: Ik wacht op het rapport. β Ik wacht erop. (I am waiting for it.)
- If the two parts stand next to each other, write them as one word. Two forms change shape: met (with) becomes mee in ermee, and tot (to) becomes toe in ertoe.
| Fixed combination | Joined form | Split example |
|---|---|---|
| rekenen op | erop | Ik reken er niet op. (I am not counting on it.) |
| denken aan | eraan | Ik denk er vaak aan. (I often think about it.) |
| geloven in | erin | Ik geloof er nog steeds in. (I still believe in it.) |
| praten over | erover | We hebben er gisteren over gepraat. (We talked about it yesterday.) |
| het eens zijn met | ermee | Ik ben het er niet mee eens. (I do not agree with it.) |
| dwingen tot | ertoe | Ze hebben me er uiteindelijk toe gedwongen. (They eventually forced me to do it.) |
Things and people follow different patterns
For a person, normally keep the preposition plus a name or stressed object pronoun: Ik wacht op Noor. / Ik wacht op haar. (I am waiting for Noor / her.) For a thing, use er: Ik wacht op de bus. β Ik wacht erop. (I am waiting for it.) The sequence op het is therefore not always wrong. It is normal when het is the article before a noun, as in op het rapport (for the report); a bare op het meaning for it is the form to avoid.
Joined and split positions
When er and its preposition stand next to each other, they form one written word. When sentence material comes between them, write the two parts separately. For many combinations, joined and split patterns are both normal. Adding a modifier does not create a mechanical rule that every form must split. Unstressed er often comes early, so split forms are especially common.
- With no intervening material: Ik reken erop. (I am counting on it.) We praten erover. (We are talking about it.)
- With intervening material: Ik reken er niet op. (I am not counting on it.) Ik heb er lang op gewacht. (I waited for it for a long time.)
- Before a final verb group: Ik zal er morgen op letten. (I will pay attention to it tomorrow.) Ik heb er lang op moeten wachten. (I had to wait for it for a long time.)
- In a subordinate clause, the verb group stands at the end but er still precedes its partner: ... omdat ik er lang op heb gewacht. (... because I waited for it for a long time.)
In a split form, the later preposition may look stranded, but it is complete because er supplies the reference: Ik wacht er nog op. (I am still waiting for it.) Questions about things behave the same way. Both Waarop wacht je? and Waar wacht je op? mean What are you waiting for? The second is a normal split form, not a forgotten object.
Choose the reference word
| Form | Reference | Example |
|---|---|---|
| er + preposition | already-mentioned things | Ik werk ermee. (I work with it.) |
| hier + preposition | this / these | Hiermee open je de deur. (You open the door with this.) |
| daar + preposition | that / those | Daar ben ik het niet mee eens. (I do not agree with that.) |
| waar + preposition | what / which thing | Waar wacht je op? (What are you waiting for?) |
The table uses all four words to refer to things, rather than literal locations. Hier, daar, and waar can also be joined to or split from their preposition: hiermee / hier ... mee, daarop / daar ... op, waarover / waar ... over. For a person, use preposition + wie: Op wie wacht je? (Who are you waiting for?) For the relative-clause pattern, see waarmee, waarover.
Check which use of er you have
This lesson's er both points back to a thing and has a partner preposition. Other uses follow different tests. Er staat een fiets buiten. (There is a bicycle outside.) introduces existence. Ik heb er drie. (I have three of them.) pairs er with a quantity. Ik woon in Utrecht. β Ik woon er. (I live there.) uses locative er, so the source preposition in is not automatically retained. Compare the last example with a genuine thing-reference: Ik geloof in dat plan. β Ik geloof erin. (I believe in that plan. β I believe in it.)
Mistakes to avoid
- Do not translate the English phrases 'for it' or 'with it' word for word as op het or met het. Use erop or ermee. Keep het after the preposition only when it introduces a noun: op het plan, met het gereedschap.
- Do not force every modifier into one placement formula. Ik denk eraan. and Ik denk er vaak aan. are both well formed; the joined or split choice belongs to the whole clause.
- Do not use the thing-form for a person: Ik praat met hem. (I am talking to him), not Ik praat ermee with that meaning.
- Keep a retained preposition separate from a separable-verb particle. In Daar tel ik de btw bij op. (I add the VAT to that), bij partners with daar, while op belongs to the verb optellen.
- How do you say 'I am waiting for it' when it is a thing, using *wachten op*?
- *Ik wacht op het.*
- *Ik wacht erop.*
- *Ik wacht het op.*
- *Ik wacht op hem.*
The thing-reference becomes *er* while *op* stays with *wachten*: *Ik wacht erop.* A full noun phrase such as *op het rapport* is fine, but bare *op het* cannot mean for it here.
- Which split sentence is neutral Dutch for I am not thinking about it?
- *Ik denk eraan niet.*
- *Ik denk er niet aan.*
- *Ik denk aan er niet.*
- *Ik er denk niet aan.*
In the split pattern, unstressed *er* comes early and the retained *aan* follows *niet*: *Ik denk er niet aan.*
- Which joined form means 'with it'?
- *ermet*
- *eraan*
- *ermee*
- *erbij*
The preposition *met* changes to *mee* after *er*, giving *ermee*. Similarly, *tot* becomes *toe* in *ertoe*.
- Which sentence uses the form that means 'that'?
- *Ik ben het dat niet mee eens.*
- *Ik ben het daar niet mee eens.*
- *Ik ben het waar niet mee eens.*
- *Ik ben het daar niet met eens.*
Referential *daar* means that, and *met* becomes the later form *mee*: *Ik ben het daar niet mee eens.*
- You are waiting for Noor. Which sentence is correct?
- *Ik wacht erop.*
- *Ik wacht op haar.*
- *Ik wacht eraan.*
- *Ik wacht waar op.*
Noor is a person, so keep *op* before the object pronoun *haar*: *Ik wacht op haar.* Use *erop* for a thing.
Test yourself
Question 1 of 5
How do you say 'I am waiting for it' when it is a thing, using wachten op?