Er wordt gewerkt: the Dutch passive with no subject
How Dutch forms an impersonal passive with er, singular worden, and a past participle when the active verb has no direct object.
A notice saying Er wordt hier gewerkt (Work is being done here) describes an activity without making the workers the subject; this is the Dutch onpersoonlijk passief (impersonal passive), a passive clause with no grammatical subject. It is especially useful for rules, reports, signs, and descriptions of what people do in a place.
How do you form the impersonal passive?
Use a singular form of worden plus the past participle. In the neutral pattern, put non-referring er in the first position: Er wordt + past participle.
| Active idea | Impersonal passive | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| De medewerkers overleggen. | Er wordt overlegd. | People are holding a meeting. |
| De bezoekers lachen. | Er wordt gelachen. | People are laughing. |
| Men sprak over het voorstel. | Er werd over het voorstel gesproken. | The proposal was discussed. |
| De gasten hebben tot laat gedanst. | Er is tot laat gedanst. | There was dancing until late. |
The ordinary personal passive promotes a direct object: De commissie bespreekt het plan → Het plan wordt besproken. The verbs overleggen, lachen, and spreken over in the table have no direct object to promote in these uses. The impersonal passive therefore has no grammatical subject at all.
Remember: no subject means singular worden. Always use third-person singular wordt, werd, or is in this construction. A plural noun inside a prepositional phrase is not the subject: Over de nieuwe regels wordt gesproken, not worden gesproken.
What happens to er when another phrase comes first?
Initial er fills the first position of a main clause; it does not refer to a place or thing. If you put a time, place, or other phrase first, the finite verb remains second and er can often disappear.
| First position | Natural sentence | What happens to er |
|---|---|---|
| Neutral opening | Er wordt vanavond in de hal gezongen. | Er occupies the first position. |
| Place adjunct | In deze ruimte wordt niet gegeten. | Er is normally unnecessary; In deze ruimte wordt er niet gegeten is also possible in a suitable context. |
| Prepositional complement | Over beide aanvragen werd lang gesproken. | The fronted complement supplies established information, so er is normally omitted. |
| Subordinate clause | Ik hoorde dat er beneden werd overlegd. | Er may stand in the middle field when the event is presented as new. |
This is presentative er, related to the non-referring use introduced under existential er. It is not a replacement for over beide aanvragen. Do not turn the sentence into erover wordt gesproken unless erover itself refers back to an already mentioned topic; that is the separate er + preposition pattern.
Which verbs can form this passive?
The productive pattern uses an activity that can be understood as performed by people or other deliberate actors. It works with intransitive activities and with verbs whose selected complement begins with a preposition.
| Verb type | Active pattern | Impersonal passive |
|---|---|---|
| Activity without an object | Iedereen werkte door. | Er werd doorgewerkt. |
| Verb with a prepositional complement | De raad stemde over het voorstel. | Over het voorstel werd gestemd. |
| Verb used without its possible object | De aanwezigen aten en dronken. | Er werd gegeten en gedronken. |
| Communication with a clause | Iemand vertelde dat de afspraak verviel. | Er werd verteld dat de afspraak verviel. |
An event without a deliberate performer normally does not fit. Rain cannot choose to act, so Er wordt geregend is excluded in the ordinary meaning. An animal sound is also not automatically recast as a human activity: Er wordt geblaat cannot simply mean that sheep are bleating. Context can create marked theatrical, humorous, or command-like readings, but those exceptions are not the productive learner rule.
Why do many zijn-perfect verbs resist the pattern?
Many intransitive verbs that form the active perfect with zijn describe a change of state or movement toward an endpoint rather than an ongoing controlled activity. Their ordinary uses therefore resist the impersonal passive.
| Ordinary active perfect | Safe conclusion |
|---|---|
| De trein is vertrokken. | Do not mechanically form Er is vertrokken as a neutral report about departures. |
| De baby is ingeslapen. | The ordinary change-of-state meaning does not produce a neutral impersonal passive. |
| We zijn naar huis gegaan. | A destination event normally remains active. |
This is a strong tendency, not a ban on every verb that ever takes zijn. A speaker can force an activity reading in an order such as En nu wordt er vertrokken! (Right, now we are leaving!), and verbs such as beginnen met and stoppen met occur naturally in impersonal passives: Er wordt met de renovatie begonnen. Learn established uses rather than applying the auxiliary test as an absolute formula.
How does the pattern work with modal verbs?
A modal adds permission, obligation, or possibility while the passive infinitive stays at the end. Keep the finite modal singular and close the clause with the participle plus worden.
| Meaning | Pattern | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Permission or prohibition | mag/mocht + participle + worden | Hier mag niet gefietst worden. |
| Obligation | moet/moest + participle + worden | Er moet stiller gewerkt worden. |
| Possibility | kan/kon + participle + worden | Over dat punt kan later gestemd worden. |
Negation follows the ordinary middle-field rules. On a sign, Hier mag niet geparkeerd worden negates the permitted activity. The dedicated page on the position of niet explains how a different placement can change what is denied.
When is the impersonal passive useful?
- Rules and signs: In de wachtruimte wordt niet gebeld.
- Minutes and reports: Er werd uitgebreid over de begroting gesproken.
- Descriptions of activity: Op het plein werd tot middernacht gedanst.
- Instructions without naming the actor: Er moet eerst gecontroleerd worden.
Use an active sentence when the actor is important: De inspecteur controleert de documenten. Use a personal passive when an object should become the subject: De documenten worden gecontroleerd. Choose the impersonal passive when the activity itself is central and no direct object becomes the subject: Er wordt gecontroleerd.
Mistakes to avoid
- Do not make worden agree with a noun inside a prepositional phrase: Over drie voorstellen wordt gestemd.
- Do not keep initial er before the finite verb after fronting: write In de zaal wordt gedanst, not In de zaal er wordt gedanst.
- Do not promote a prepositional complement as though it were a direct object. Over het plan wordt gesproken has no grammatical subject.
- Do not form a neutral impersonal passive from every intransitive verb. Check for a plausible activity by a deliberate performer and remember the resistance of many zijn-perfect verbs.
See also
Review the ordinary passive voice, presentational er, and prepositional er. The position of niet applies inside these passive clauses too.
- Which sentence correctly reports that people are working in the building?
- Er worden in het gebouw gewerkt.
- Er wordt in het gebouw gewerkt.
- Het wordt in het gebouw gewerkt.
- Er wordt in het gebouw werken.
The impersonal passive has no grammatical subject, so it uses singular *wordt* plus the past participle *gewerkt*.
- Which sentence has the natural word order after the place phrase is fronted?
- In deze straat er wordt niet gefietst.
- In deze straat niet wordt gefietst.
- In deze straat wordt niet gefietst.
- In deze straat worden niet gefietst.
The fronted place phrase fills the first position and singular *wordt* follows it. Initial placeholder *er* is no longer needed.
- Why is *Over de voorstellen wordt morgen gestemd* singular?
- Because *voorstellen* is a het-word.
- Because *morgen* forces singular agreement.
- Because every passive is singular.
- Because the clause has no grammatical subject; *de voorstellen* belongs to the phrase with *over*.
The fronted prepositional complement is not the subject. A subjectless impersonal passive keeps the finite verb singular.
- Which modal passive is correctly formed?
- Hier mag niet parkeren worden.
- Hier mogen niet geparkeerd worden.
- Hier mag niet geparkeerd worden.
- Hier wordt niet mogen geparkeerd.
Use the singular finite modal *mag* and close the clause with past participle + *worden*: *geparkeerd worden*.
- Which proposed passive should you reject in its ordinary literal meaning?
- Er wordt in de keuken gelachen.
- Over de klacht wordt gesproken.
- Er wordt buiten geregend.
- In de hal wordt gewacht.
Ordinary rain has no deliberate performer, so *regenen* does not form this impersonal passive. The other sentences describe human activities.
Test yourself
Question 1 of 5
Which sentence correctly reports that people are working in the building?