The relative pronoun wat after alles, iets, a superlative, or a whole clause
When relative wat is standard, when dat is also possible, and when a whole preceding clause requires wat.
Both Alles wat klaar is and Alles dat klaar is mean ‘Everything that is ready’, so Dutch does not always force a choice between relative wat and dat. A complete preceding statement requires wat: in De levering kwam te laat, wat extra kosten veroorzaakte. (The delivery arrived late, which caused extra costs.), wat comments on the whole event.
When do you choose relative wat?
After an indefinite pronoun or a nominalised adjective, wat is a standard option alongside dat. After a whole preceding clause, use wat, not dat. First identify what the relative clause refers back to.
- After alles, iets, niets, and similar indefinite forms, both wat and dat are correct: Er is iets wat/dat we moeten bespreken. (There is something that we need to discuss.)
- After het enige and a nominalised adjective or superlative, both forms are possible: Dat is het verstandigste wat/dat je nu kunt doen. (That is the wisest thing you can do now.)
- After a complete clause or thought, use a comma plus wat: De afspraak werd geannuleerd, wat niemand had verwacht. (The appointment was cancelled, which nobody had expected.)
| Antecedent | Standard choice | Example |
|---|---|---|
| alles, iets, niets | wat or dat | Niets wat/dat hier staat, is geheim. (Nothing written here is secret.) |
| nominalised adjective or superlative | wat or dat | Het moeilijkste wat/dat nog komt, is het gesprek. (The hardest thing still to come is the conversation.) |
| het enige, het eerste, het laatste | wat or dat | Dit is het enige wat/dat ontbreekt. (This is the only thing missing.) |
| a whole preceding clause | wat | De huur stijgt, wat veel bewoners zorgen baart. (The rent is rising, which worries many residents.) |
With indefinite forms, wat is often common and may sound more natural, especially after alles. That preference does not make alles dat wrong. The same applies to het enige dat: it is standard Dutch, just like het enige wat.
Can wat and dat change the meaning after a superlative?
Sometimes. Relative wat can give the superlative a broad domain: all relevant things or experiences. Relative dat can recover an unspoken singular neuter noun and compare members of that noun class. This is a meaning nuance, not a claim that either form is generally incorrect.
| Sentence | Likely comparison |
|---|---|
| Dit verslag is het duidelijkste wat ik dit jaar heb gelezen. | This report is clearest among everything I have read this year. |
| Dit verslag is het duidelijkste dat ik dit jaar heb gelezen. | An unspoken verslag is recovered: it is the clearest report I have read this year. |
Context can reduce or remove the difference, so do not force two readings into every sentence. The contrast is clearest when dat has an obvious neuter noun to recover and the broader set for wat is plausible.
How does wat refer to a whole clause?
A complete statement can act as the antecedent of a non-restrictive relative clause. Put a comma before wat: De commissie stelde het besluit uit, wat tot nieuwe vragen leidde. (The committee postponed the decision, which led to new questions.). Here wat refers to the postponement, not just to het besluit.
| Intended reference | Correct form | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| one neuter noun | Het voorstel dat gisteren binnenkwam ... | dat modifies the noun voorstel |
| the preceding event | Het voorstel kwam gisteren binnen, wat ons verraste. | wat comments on the whole statement |
If the relative clause needs a preposition, replace preposition + wat with a relative waar-form: Het loket sloot vroeg, waar veel bezoekers niet op hadden gerekend. (The desk closed early, which many visitors had not expected.). The verb frame is op iets rekenen, so the clause uses waar ... op.
The noun-building patterns datgene wat and formal hetgeen belong to relatives without a separate noun. This page only cross-links them; it does not use them to redefine the choices above.
When to use each pattern
- Use wat or dat after an indefinite form: alles wat/dat, iets wat/dat, and niets wat/dat.
- Use wat or dat after het enige and nominalised adjectives or superlatives.
- Choose wat for a broad superlative reading and dat when you intend a recoverable neuter noun, if the context makes that contrast relevant.
- Use comma + wat when the antecedent is a whole preceding clause.
- Use waar + preposition when the relative role includes a preposition: waar ... mee, waar ... op, or another appropriate combination.
Mistakes to avoid
- Do not mark alles dat or het enige dat as an error; both have standard alternatives with wat.
- Do not use dat to comment on a whole preceding clause: write De prijs daalde, wat ons verbaasde.
- Do not confuse a noun antecedent with a clause antecedent: het bericht dat ... modifies bericht, while comma + wat can refer to the whole event.
- Do not place wat directly after a preposition in this pattern; use a waar-form where Dutch permits one.
See also
Review ordinary relative die and dat, relative clauses with a preposition, and indefinite people and things. Keep relative wat separate from indirect-question order.
- Which completion is standard in *Alles ___ in deze doos ligt, mag weg*?
- Only *wat*
- Only *dat*
- Both *wat* and *dat*
- Neither *wat* nor *dat*
After *alles*, both relative *wat* and *dat* are standard. *Wat* may be commoner, but *alles dat* is not wrong.
- Choose the relative form: *De trein reed niet, ___ voor veel vertraging zorgde.*
- die
- dat
- wat
- wie
The relative clause comments on the complete fact that the train was not running, so use comma + *wat*.
- What does *Dit rapport is het beste dat we hebben ontvangen* most naturally imply?
- It is the best report among the reports received.
- It is the best of everything ever received.
- No report was received.
- The word *rapport* is plural.
Here *dat* can recover the neuter noun *rapport*: it selects the best report within that noun class.
- Which sentence correctly uses the preposition required by *blij zijn met*?
- De regeling veranderde, met wat niemand blij was.
- De regeling veranderde, wat niemand blij mee was.
- De regeling veranderde, waar niemand blij mee was.
- De regeling veranderde, daar niemand blij met was.
When the relative role includes *met*, Dutch uses the relative pronominal adverb *waar ... mee*: *waar niemand blij mee was*.
- Which statement about *Dit is het enige dat/wat nog ontbreekt* is correct?
- Only *dat* is standard.
- Only *wat* is standard.
- Both are standard after *het enige*.
- The sentence requires *wie*.
Both *het enige dat* and *het enige wat* are standard. This is documented variation, not a hard correctness contrast.
Test yourself
Question 1 of 5
Which completion is standard in Alles ___ in deze doos ligt, mag weg?